L’APPROCHE SENSORIELLE : DE LA PENSEE SCIENTIFIQUE A LA PRATIQUE PEDAGOGIQUE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work is the result of an interdisciplinary collaboration involving experts from the disciplines of architecture, urban planning, psychology and signal processing. It explains how to capture the unseizable and evaluate the ambient quality of spaces, as well as the perception of their users. This research places affective experience at the heart of its scientific and pedagogical concerns.
Our main spatial analysis tool was affective response (PENEAU, 2012) to study users' experiences and perceptions in architectural and urban environments. This enabled us to understand how emotions can influence the way we perceive and interact with space.
Our research work is divided into two phases (LAYEB et AL., 2014; 2016; 2019; 2022). A first work was dedicated to the urban user experience in downtown Tunis in order to identify stressful spatial and atmospheric configurations that affect the well-being, perception and emotion of the urban user.
Our work was then extended to specific users with sensory disorders, whose perception is described as impaired. We followed autistic subjects during their daily journeys in their care centers. We were able to study their sensory profiles (DUNN, 2007) through behavioral analysis.
The results of this research open up new avenues of reflection on how we teach architectural and urban design, which can be influenced by users' spatial perceptions and sensitive, affective experiences.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
AUGOYARD, J.-F. et TORGUE, H. (1995). A l'écoute de l'environnement. Répertoire des effets sonores. Marseille: Parenthèses.
BEN AYED. A et LAYEB S – 2016 : «L’initiation à l’architecture sensible : la place de l’émotion ». Les journées internationales de l’initiation pédagogique dans l’enseignement supérieur JIP’2016, 2016, Sousse, Tunisie, p. 139-147, http://jip.ieee.tn/des-articles-acceptes/
BOUSCEIN, W. (2012). Electrodermal Activity, Springer Science and Business Media, Germany.
CHELKOFF, G. (1992). La mise en vue de l'espace public. Grenoble: Cresson.
CRUNELLE M. (1996). L'architecture et nos sens. Bruxelles : PUB.
DESHAY. C 2002: , Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS/AIS). Universidade da Coruña, Espagne, 2012, ISBN: 978-84-9749-522-6
DONADIEU, B. (2002). L’apprentissage du regard, leçons d’architecture de Dominique Spinetta,savoir-faire pour l’architecture, Paris, éditions de la Villette, 2002.
DROZD. C. (2011), Représentations langagières et iconographiques des ambiances architecturales, De l’intention de l’ambiance à la perception sensible de l’usager, thèse de doctorat, ENSA Nantes, 2011.
DUNN, W. -2007: “Sensory processing in children with and without autism: A comparative study using the Short Sensory Profile”. American Journal of Occupational Therapy,, 61,190–200.
FAKHFAKH. M. et GALLOUZI. S – 2014: « The initiation to architectural analysis viewed by a group of architect teachers ». A: Arquitectonics. International Conference Arquitectonics Network: Architecture, Education and Society, Barcelone, Université polytechnique de Catalunya, 2014.
GROSJEAN, M. et THIBAUD J-P. (2001). L'espace urbain en méthode, Parenthèses Editions, Marseille.
HAMMAD. M. – 2012 : « La sémiotisation de l’espace, Esquisse d’une manière de faire », Actes sémiotiques n°116, 2012.
HEALEY, J. A. (2000). Detecting Stress During Real-World Tasks, Using Physiological Sensors. Cambridge: MIT.
Khalfa N. (2015). Change point detection of physiological signals within in vivo settings via the FDpV method : case of the heart rate and the electrodermal activity of marathoners. Systems and Control [en ligne]. These de docotrat. Paris: Université Pierre et Marie Curie – VI. Disponible sur: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/ tel-01361322
LAYEB, S et BELHADJ SALEM, M. -2014: “Commented walk, segmented walk: An exploratory study on the relationship between urban space and sound stress, Invisible Places sounding cities, 18-20 Juillet 2014, Viseu, Portugal, 2014, pp. 371-387, http://invisibleplaces.org/IP2014.pdf
LAYEB, S AND BELHADJ SALEM, M. - 2019: “ Q Sensor for the City on the Threshold of Stress: Degenerative Dimension of the Sound Atmosphere dans Hachem Abusaada et Abir Elshater (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Digital Research Methods and Architectural Tools in Urban Planning and Design, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2019, pp.121-137.
LAYEB, S ET AL. – 2016: “The Sonic Ambiance as a Transforms Operator of our Cities and our Architecture: The case of autistic children and elderly”. Nicolas Réemy et Nicolas Tixier (dir.), Ambiances, tomorrow. Proceedings of 3rd International Congress on Ambiances, vol. 1, September 2016, Volos, International Network Ambiances; University of Thessaly, 2016, p. 177 - 182, hal-01409725.
LAYEB, S ET AL. -2016 : Caractérisation ambiantale des espaces d'accueil pour enfants autistes : vers une projectuelle des ambiances, Séminaire de Conception Architecturale Numérique, SCAN’16, Toulouse, 2016, ISBN : 978-2-8143-0289-1, pp. 163-172.
LAYEB, S. -2020: “The place of emotions in the urban and architectural experience”, pp. 151-158, Algerian Journal of Engineering Architecture and Urbanism AJEAU, Vol. 4 Nr. 3 2020, ISSN: 2588-1760, https://www.aneau.org/ajeau/Art/ajeau_v4_n3.pdf
LE CORRE, Y. (2006). Le « pattern ambiant» : une entité opératoire de caractérisation et de conception des ambiances urbaines. Nantes : université de Nantes, école polytechnique de l’université de Nantes .
PENEAU, J.-P. -2012 : « L’approche ambiantale : une complexité augmentée ». DNArchi, <http://dnarchi.fr/culture/lapproche-ambiantale-une-complexite-augmentee-partie-ii/>.
PÉNEAU J.-P. et JOANNE P. – 1998: ”Ambiances et références du projet”. In Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale, n°42 / 43 (Ambiances architecturales et urbaines), Ed. Parenthèses, pp. 25-36.
PICARD, R. (2009). Future affective technology for autism and emotion communication, Philosophy Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 364.12: 1535, Biological Sciences, 3575-3584.
RAYNAUD, D. (1989). Architecture comparées Essai sur la dynamique des formes. Parenthèses, Paris, 1989.
RÉMON, M. (1978). La façade épaisse, Paris, édition Copédith.
SELLEM. F et BOURICHA. F – 214: «Understanding of the logic of nesting of the different realities of architectural space: pedagogical approach». A: Arquitectonics. International Conference Arquitectonics Network: Architecture, Education and Society, Barcelone, Université polytechnique de Catalunya.
THIBAUD. J-P – 2012 : « Petite archéologie de la notion d'ambiance ». Communications, 90, 2012. Les bruits de la ville [Numéro dirigé par Anthony Pecqueux] p. 155-174; doi : 10.3406/comm.2012.2659
ZEVI, B. (1959). Apprendre à voir l’architecture, Editions de Minuit, Paris.
ZUMTHOR, P. (2008), Penser l’architecture, Editions Birkhauser.